This is the (chronologically compiled) history of US Soccer jerseys (as best as I can figure out given the limited resources online). Some are historical pictures, some are recently created throwbacks, some may even be just flat out wrong (- my apologies in advance). The editions worn in a World Cup are noted.
1916 White
1930 White (World Cup)
1934 Blue (World Cup)
1950 Home (World Cup)
1959 Home - Pan America Games
1972 Home (Olympics)
(US Olympic Team)
1974 Red
Worn in a 1974 game vs Mexico, it drops a crest and goes with awful USA lettering. And without that awful lettering, this could pass as USSR. A forgettable effort during the dark ages of US Soccer. 1 out of 10.
The white version of the standard Adidas template. They lacked the foresight to go back to a shield, unfortunately. 2 out of 10.
A very 80's look by Adidas. Not horrible, not really memorable. The USA "flag" font however looks ridiculous. They would have been better off with solid letters or with our old crest/shield. 4 out of 10.
This is starting to look more and more like a goalkeeper kit to me. Not sure why there is an added patch below the lettering but a 4 year old could have designed it. 3 out of 10.
For
our first successful WC qualifying campaign in 40 years, Adidas put out
another classic clean look. The only feature that sticks out is the
blue stripe on top of the shoulder, slightly (American) football-ish.
Also, a new circular crest
has appeared for the first time, definitely an upgrade. A traditional
US shield is actually enclosed inside the ring. The crest looks
better up close but it appears too busy from a distance. 5 out of 10.
While probably released for the '90 WC, the US wore its home whites for all 3 group matches. Basically a
reverse of the home look, Adidas made an emphasis of the
over-the-shoulder stripe look from the '88 home which they would then
continue in the 1992-94 edition. I like it slightly better than
the white, which isn't saying much. 4 out of 10.
(Fernando Clavijo)
Nike
keeps the stripe-across-the-chest-polo-shirt-look going. It does looks
a little like a tennis shirt but I like the classic feel overall. One
of my favorite designs. 9 out of 10.
(Earnie Stewart)
This
design is simple and clean but in the end, it looks like a lazy
effort. Its basically a white t-shirt with blue trim. Great, thanks.
Okay, so this t-shirt is still better than the 94 WC jerseys. 4 out of 10.
(Landon Donovan)
Since
it has color, it rates better than the home whites. While red is a
great jersey color and I loved the '98 edition, I still think our
main away color should be navy blue. Red has been the predominant color
of just about all US enemies - the redcoats, the nazis, the
communists, the devil, etc. And if we do wear red, it has to
be paired with blue shorts. 5 out of 10.
(Cory Gibbs)
The first 1950 throwback was released with a blue sash instead of the original red. 9 out of 10.
(Landon Donovan)
This
is obviously another nod to the classic 1950s kit. While I prefer the
white tops to be paired with blue shorts, FIFA's rules don't always
allow it, which is why Landon scored the Algeria goal in the
all-whites. The light gray sash seems to me to be an indecisive touch
by Nike - on television, it is hardly noticeable at all. Go big or go
home. It should have been the navy blue or perhaps two toned - red and
blue. Also, the sash should have been thinner and slightly more
horizontal so that it doesn't run shoulder to hip - and therefore less
pageant-like. 7 out of 10.
(Michael Bradley)
This new jersey commemorates the 100th anniversary of US Soccer's existence (1913). Just as the pre-1950s jerseys were, it is plain white, with the shield being the main attraction. However, I wish they had the guts to use an enlarged shield and place it centered on the chest, just as it was 100 years ago. The blue v-neck collar and thick arm cuffs are a nod to the first US jersey as well. Yes, overall this throwback is clean, simple and elegant. And yes, it is a necessary (and hopefully extended) relief from the horrific "where's Waldo" disaster. But ultimately, the reality is that this jersey is nearly identical to the '00-'02 Home jersey, except with the throwback shield. Furthermore, I personally prefer the shield to say 'USA' on it. 7 out of 10.
(Jermaine Jones)
After ditching the traditional home whites for the "where's waldo" horror show, Nike went back to what it began back in 1995 for every edition of our home jersey. I actually love that our home jersey is white. But I'm not too excited with this release. At first glance, this looks like those travel polos that our team wears on the plane. Or something Federer wears at Wimbledon. I've got no problem with collars, but why are there buttons on a jersey? However, the biggest mistake is the lack of imagination in a World Cup year. Look at our last two WC home releases. One had a vertical stripe '06, the other a (faint) diagonal stripe '10. Like it or not, they were at least unique designs to the US. This one is nearly identical to England's 2010 WC home. Plain, white polo with buttons. Ok, ok, up close, it has thin, gray pinstripes, but they're undetectable from a distance. Bring back a red/blue two toned stripe somewhere. Anywhere. They call this a classic, I call it boring. As for the crest, a lighter shade of blue has been used predominantly throughout. 4 out of 10.
(Clint Dempsey)
For the first time since the red kits of 1998 and 2000, the away jersey is not
predominantly navy blue. Technically, its mostly red on the front and
completely red on the back. In a Nike-crafted statement, Dempsey hails
it as a "patriotic colorway". Is this design unique as US jerseys go?
Absolutely. Is it American? No. It looks like Russia invaded
Nike HQ. Not acceptable at all. Adidas actually had us in a lighter shade of blue all the way
up through the '94 WC (denims!?!) but when Nike took over in '95, they
went to dark blue. Besides, the barely-worn pinstripe third jersey of
'07, this is the first time they've gone back to that lighter shade.
Nike, please go back to the blue from our flag. And just
as the Where's Waldo stripes did, I think it looks better on our
women's team than on our men. But, I must admit that this kit has grown on me a bit since its release. Unlike its home counterpart, it is an unique design not often seen in futbol. 6 out of 10.
As for the new crest, I'm glad they kept the shield, used the letters 'USA' and went to blue letters and red stripes (instead of the previous blue stripes and red lettering). However, the narrow design and the flat top give it an overly modern look and therefore robs it of a certain timelessness.
(DeAndre Yedlin)
Because it is black, the away version looks more like a training/warmup shirt than the white version - you know, like an Under Armour compression shirt worn for workouts or under football pads. I am not bothered by the different color sleeves, however I do like that the blue is closer to that of our flag. The black patches on the chest muscles is much more noticeable on the black version, and it gives it the look of a superhero's body armor. Should've gone all in and put in an 8-pack like Italy did a few years ago! I kid. Ultimately, even though I would have preferred if they used the navy blue instead of black as the predominant color, I don't mind experimentation with the away kits during these off-WC years. Also, you probably need to workout before wearing it. 5 out of 10.
2017 Third
1979-81 Home
1981 Blue (Youth)
(Todd Saldana)
I have no idea if only our youth team wore this style, but since it was worn in international competition (shown here vs Poland), you'd think Adidas would have outfitted our men's team in it as well. Either way, its worth a look. This kit is quite the departure from our ugly 70's template. This design is the first modern design I've come across in US history. It could actually still be used today. 6 out of 10.
1983 Team America (NASL)
(Dan Canter)
Apparently US Soccer joined the NASL that one season as a club team so they could have more training time together. Not sure that they played any international games in this kit, but we'll include it here anyway. Does this shirt remind anybody of anything? Say, a certain 2012 release? Not a fan. 1 out of 10.
1984 Home
1984 Blue (Olympics)
At least we know that the blue version was worn in Olympic competition. Not sure about the exact shade of blue, but either way, its an improvement over white or red. 5 out of 10.
1984 Red
1988 Home
1988 Away
This
actually has a very distinct V-shaped thread pattern (which almost
makes it look like a soft blanket). As opposed to the home, it loses
the collar and opts for a V-neck. Also, the crest is darkened for this
away version and looks even busier, if that is possible. Actually, it
reminds me of a US military crest. Overall, one of our more interesting looks. 6 out of 10.
(Paul Caligiuri)
One site lists this as the 1986 home. Others says that it was the '90-91 edition. Perhaps they wore it in the mid 80s and brought it back for '89 qualifiers. Maybe they had different WC jerseys just for the '90 WC but also used this through '91. Who knows? What we know is that this is the design in which Caligiuri scored the "shot heard round
the world" back in Nov 1989. I'd give this
simple look a 5 out of 10.
1989 Home
1988-? Away
(Mike Windischmann)
This away jersey seems to have been worn in games in '88 as well as possibly 1990-92. (There are pictures of Wynalda wearing this shirt and his international career didn't start until the 90s.) Like the white home version above, it is difficult to pin down when this edition came out. However, you'll notice that the adidas logo is their famous trefoil, which they seems to have been replaced after the '90 WC for their new triangular logo. Sure, the darker circular spots livens up the plain classic design a bit, but not for the better. 4 out of 10.
1990 Home (World Cup)
(Tab Ramos)
For our first World Cup in 40 years, this was a pretty poor effort. To me, this doesn't say, "the USA is back!". Its more like, "you ain't gonna remember us anyway." The longer I look at it, the more I think it almost has a Native American Indian look. 3
out of 10.
1990 Away (World Cup)
1991 Blue
(Dominic Kinnear / Peter Vermes?)
This jersey was worn in the inaugural 1991 Gold Cup, won by the US in an upset. It ushers in the triangular adidas logo, instead of the traditional trefoil. Also, Adidas becomes extremely aggressive with the 3 stripes for the next few years until they completely lost their minds for the '94 world cup. This '91 edition has a white collar and the old crest, which sets it apart from the '92 edition. 5 out of 10.
1992-1994 Home
(Cobi Jones)
The new US crest is not much of a crest at all. But we have continued the swooshing ball to this day on the current shield. As for the blue and red stripes, it is memorable for ushering in the modern look in US jersey history. But I can't shake the feeling that it looks like a girl's jersey. 5 out
of 10.
1992-1994 Away
A slight variation to the '91 Gold Cup since these don't have the white collar. Red shoulder stripes may have helped, but the white just looks obnoxious. And the blue is still too light. You would never guess that this was a US jersey. 4 out of 10.
1993 Third
(Brian Quinn)
It seems that Adidas tried balance out the jersey with 3 shoulder stripes on the both sides with this release. More of a bad thing does not a good jersey make. At first glance, I actually thought this was a France jersey. 6 out of 10.
1994-1995 Home (World Cup)
(Marcelo Balboa)
Yes,
I get how the wavy red lines looks like our flag just like what they were trying to do with the white
stars on a blue background in the home version. But I just don't like
vertical stripes on a jersey, especially wavy ones. And for some reason, the sleeves were left white. 2 out of 10.
1994-1995 Away (World Cup)
(Alexi Lalas)
One
of the most memorable jerseys in US history. Also one of the worst.
Who decided that a denim look would work on a soccer jersey? And why
unleash this thing during the first World Cup we ever hosted? Alexi
Lalas is probably the only one who can pull it off. These two efforts probably led to the
switchover to Nike. 1 out of 10.
1995-1998 Home
(Thomas Dooley)
Nike
takes over US Soccer and starts with a solid effort. I like the polo
shirt look to it and the solid stripe across is a respectable look for any
soccer jersey. The US crest also appears here for the first time. 7
out of 10.
1995-1998 Away
(John Harkes)
Nike decided to go away from the lighter blue to the navy blue, you know, like the color we have on our flag. 6 out of 10.
1995-1998 Third
(Eric Wynalda)
Nike's
first US soccer jersey looked much better in white and navy blue. This
light blue one just looks dull and very.... blah. 4 out of 10.
1998-2000 Home (World Cup)
(Brian McBride)
1998-2000 Away (World Cup)
(Claudio Reyna)
This
is one of my favorite US jersey of all time. I like the vibrancy of
the red as well as the usage of white and blue. It has to be paired
with the blue shorts, however. 10 out of 10.
2000-2002 Home
2000-2002 Away
2002-2004 Home (World Cup)
(Brian McBride)
When
these first came out, I was completely in love with the shirt. Now I
think I was just in love with the success of the team. Some critics
have said it just looks like a volleyball jersey, but I still do like
the angular designs under the arms. I also like the font used for the
numbers. 7 out of 10.
2002-2004 Away (World Cup)
(John O'Brien)
The
away edition loses the collar but preserves a cool athletic look to
it. Too bad we lost both games in the WC in which we wore it. 8 out of 10.
2003 Third
2004-2006 Home
(Claudio Reyna)
Again,
Nike goes to a simpler look during the non World Cup cycle. This time,
the front has a one piece framed design, which I grew to like a lot.
What I did not like so much was the dark patch on the back where the
name is supposed to be. I also did not like the circle around the
number font, however. I know its on the Nike soccer balls, but did it
have to be on the jersey too? 6 out of 10.
2004-2006 Away
(Taylor Twellman)
Again, it is merely the reverse of the home jersey but somehow even more boring. 4 out of 10.
(Eddie Lewis)
This
"Don't Tread on Me" special release was worn just once in a warm-up
game to the World Cup. The look of it is beautiful, again with the rich
red and a two toned sash. I also prefer the collar. The only downside
to this jersey for buyers is that the version released to the public
was made of a cheap polyster material, or something like that. 9 out
of 10.
2004 Third
(McBride / Jonathan Spector)
This
throwback to the 1950 shirt was not worn nearly enough. They used the red stripe instead of '03s blue. I prefer this
crest to our current one as well. The 3/4 sleeves keep this one from
perfection. 8 out of 10.
2006 Special (Don't Tread on Me)
2006-2008 Home (World Cup)
(Clint Dempsey)
Nike's
Dri-fit age begins here as well as their more fitted look for jerseys.
I do not mind the collar-less look of these because the two toned
stripe down the left side is unique and instant classic. The stripe
extends down the shorts to the left sock. Awesome. The crest is
nicely enlarged here and outlined with a gold trim. Lastly, I also like
the college font used for the numbers. 9 out of 10.
2006-2008 Away (World Cup)
(Damarcus Beasley)
Nike
brought back the 96-98 away look for the 2006 world cup this time
without a collar. I liked how the home and away versions were
completely different but I marked this one down for unoriginality. 5
out of 10.
2007 Third
(Michael Bradley)
This jersey was memorable because of the hat trick that Donovan dropped on Ecuador. The design seemed to come out of left field with no throwback theme or really any correlation to any other US shirt. By itself, I don't think its so bad, but the shade of blue is
not to my liking and the thin pinstripes seem out of place on the field. 4 out of 10.
2008-2010 Home
(Frankie Hejduk)
This
off cycle jersey again goes for the plain look but this time has big
light blue hoops. While I'm not a big fans of the hoops, we did pull off
the Spanish conquest in these. 6 out of 10.
2008-2010 Away
(Carlos Bocanegra)
For
the first time, the US uses a color other than blue or red for the away
jersey. I'm not sure what color this is, anthracite? I actually went
months thinking that it was a dark blue but its actually probably closer
to black? Who knows? Let's stick to the navy blue please. Other than that, this was just plain. 4 out of 10 .
2010-12 Home (World Cup)
2010-12 Away (World Cup)
(Michael Bradley)
US
wore the away blues for the first 2 matches of the WC. As much as I
did not really prefer the white sash, the entire look did grow on me,
especially when Dempsey, Landon and Bradley scored giant goals in 'em.
It is essentially the reverse of the whites, except that the white sash
is now very prominent. Again, a red stripe inside or alongside the
white would be an improvement. I have yet to mention the strange stripe
on the socks for all versions - it is horizontal across the shin but
goes down behind the calf. Just weird. 6 out of 10.
2011 Third
(Brek Shea)
After a tremendous amount of fan interest, Nike released this extremely popular red kit, since US diehard fans (supporter sections) prefer to wear red at games. In general I
personally prefer the blue as the standard away color, but because Nike decided to use a blue sash instead of
the beauty pageantish white sash, this one rates higher. 8 out of 10.
2012-14 Home
(Steve Cherundolo)
This
may only be the 2nd time in US jersey history that our home jersey is
not predominantly white (94 flag jersey being the other). In addition
to the red stripes, it still has a sash, though it's extremely muted and
nearly invisible - "subtle tonal" sash, I think they call it. The
'Where's Waldo?' jersey, might be what we end up calling this edition.
After finally seeing it on the field of play, it is my least favorite US
jersey since Adidas' 94 World Cup shirts. I get that the red stripe
look is straight off our flag. But it actually looks like a yuppie
sailor outfit, the kind you'd wear if you were dressing up at
Halloween. And they didn't even have the conviction to run the stripes
all the way around. The back has a horrendously huge, white square box,
presumably so that the number and name can be displayed inside. The
past 3 Nike off-World Cup ('00, '04, '08) home jerseys have been fairly
plain. They would have been better off sticking to that plan. 1 out of 10.
2012-14 Away
(Jozy Altidore)
Nike is going with the "sash" design for this off-WC 2 year cycle. It's rumored that Nike may decide to keep the sash indefinitely as US' trademark look - I'm not entirely against the idea although I'll miss seeing the new ideas they come out with every 2 years. For the blue away, they have changed the white pageant sash to a dark one - a marked improvement. However, the sleeves are now white, giving the whole jersey the look of a vest - a marked regression. The new tri-color collar reminds me of a ribbon, but I don't hate it. Though we beat Italy in Italy in this jersey's debut, I'm giving it just a 6 out of 10.
2013 Centennial Special
2014-16 Home (World Cup)
2014-16 Away (World Cup)
2015 Third
(Fabian Johnson)
Just as they did in 2011 and 2007, Nike has released an alternate away jersey the year after a World Cup. And just like last year's away WC jersey, Nike has decided to keep the lighter blue color scheme. (See complaints about the lighter blue above). Well, sort of. They call it a "stylish gradient design" (think sedimentary rock) and it "gradiently" incorporates white up at the neck/shoulder area, a lighter blue for most of the shirt and a dark blue strip from the waistline down. The brightness of the white neck/shoulder area looks completely out of place and detracts from the look. On the plus side, the shorts and the socks are dark blue and the thick white stripe running down the side of the entire kit works. However, just like the "Where's Waldo" and last year's "Bomb Pop" designs, this looks much more fitting for our women's team than our men's. It leads me to believe that this was designed with this year's Women's World Cup in mind. At least it isn't predominantly red. 3 out of 10.
2016-18 Home
(Gyasi Zardes)
At first glance though, it is an interesting take to our traditional white kit. The design reminds me somewhat of the 2004 edition, where the cut of the shoulder/arm seams frames the torso to give it an athletic look. It can also look like a raglan baseball shirt. My major gripe though is still with the lightness of the blue. They brought in the lighter shade for the 2014 WC and I'm hoping it goes away in time for the 2018 WC. Also, the white front looks like its lacking something - a stripe running in any direction would be an improvement. 4 out of 10.As for the new crest, I'm glad they kept the shield, used the letters 'USA' and went to blue letters and red stripes (instead of the previous blue stripes and red lettering). However, the narrow design and the flat top give it an overly modern look and therefore robs it of a certain timelessness.
2016-18 Away
2017 Third
(Christian Pulisic)
The last time the US used a predominantly red kit was the 2011 Third. The difference was that the 2011 design was developed uniquely for the US' 2010 World Cup. This 3rd edition of the 2016 kit is simply the red take on the current Nike template. Even more pathetic is the fact that it is virtually identical to England and Portugal - both have the same red-with-black-shoulders color scheme. There is little that is unique, much less American about this 3rd kit. Had they logically decided to use navy blue shoulders, as they did for one of the 2016 Away shoulders, and navy blue shorts, I would have been on board. The red monochrome crest adds to the overly red and non-American look. And lest you think I'm just hatin' on red kits, the highest rating given out in the last 8 years was the 2011 Third red kit. Let's not reward this lazy effort. 2 out of 10.
